Recently, Ripple Labs filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority pointing out the implications of the recent Binance decision.” It has been filed in response to Ripple’s opposition to the pending motion of the SEC for remedies and entry of final judgment. At the core of Ripple’s argument draws from the U.S.
It specifically pointed out the June 28 Memorandum Opinion and Order of the District Court for the District of Columbia in SEC v. Binance Holdings, which reflects how the court reached a mixed ruling on the SEC’s claims related to unregistered securities sales, with significant insights relevant to its case.
The court’s decision in the Binance case partially granted and partially denied the SEC’s motion to dismiss, specifically addressing the sale of certain digital assets. Crucially, the court referenced the Howey Test, traditionally used to determine what constitutes a security, and noted that intangible digital assets do not fit neatly within its framework.
Implications for Ripple’s Case
This observation supports Ripple’s stance that digital assets’ legal ambiguity necessitates clearer regulatory guidelines. The court also criticized the SEC’s approach of regulating the billion-dollar industry through piecemeal litigation, highlighting the inefficiency and potential for inconsistent outcomes.
Ripple points to this ruling to bolster its argument that the previous summary judgment in its case, which provided much-needed clarity on the legality of various XRP sales, should mitigate the severity of any penalties.
Ripple asserts that the lack of clear regulations before this ruling means that any violation on its part does not constitute reckless disregard for the law. The SEC’s own complaint against Ripple did not allege recklessness, which the company argues should further influence the court’s decision on appropriate remedies.
The Binance complaint itself covers quite a wide range of digital assets and programs, including Binance Coin, Binance’s stablecoin, together with investment programs such as Simple Earn and BNB Vault. The action by the SEC against Binance initiated on the 6th of June 2023 accuses the exchange of soliciting U.S. investors to trade crypto asset securities on unregistered platforms; it asserts thirteen violations of federal securities laws.
Ripple’s submission addresses the broader industry’s demand for more transparent regulatory frameworks that prevent the pitfalls of litigation-driven oversight. By echoing the court’s findings in the Binance case, Ripple will attempt to temper the SEC’s push for harsh penalties and plead for a structured approach to regulating cryptocurrencies
Related Reading | Avalanche (AVAX) Consolidation Suggests Uptick: Expert Predicts Price Jump to $60-$65